Reference strip
Turn proof into publishable references
Keep the customer proof loop honest: approvals first, live signals next, then sales export and enablement.
review
Markdown, CSV and JSON handoff
needs attention
Flow Customer Proof Hub
Tenant focus: global | This page only promotes tenants with enough live signals for proof. Published references still need customer signoff.
Reference strip
Keep the customer proof loop honest: approvals first, live signals next, then sales export and enablement.
review
Markdown, CSV and JSON handoff
needs attention
Proof recovery path
Verify consent, approve the strongest customer story and hand it off to enablement when it is truly ready.
Check proof readiness, consent and live usage signals.
Close legal or data gaps before publishing references.
Publish the strongest story and reuse it in enablement.
Open onboarding and activation first so the tenant has enough live signals for a real reference.
Keep the proof loop internal until legal notice, consent and the customer quote are ready.
When a tenant is ready for reference, move it through publish flow and reuse the story in enablement.
0
Tenants with enough live signals to draft a customer reference.
0
Accounts with product usage but not yet strong enough for public proof.
0
Published capture trail across widgets, tickets and API events.
needs attention
Legal notice, retention and market coverage for sales use.
Work next
No reference-ready tenants yet. Use onboarding and activation to generate proof first.
Open activation hub
The publish gate should always start with the strongest live tenant signal, not a generic checklist.
Approval queue
Keep the proof loop public only when legal notice, consent and market coverage are ready.
Ready logos
Customer-approved proof should come from the strongest live tenants, not generic placeholders.
This is the point where tenant evidence becomes something sales can actually reuse.
0
Inside current review window: insufficient test data
insufficient test data
Consent artifact retention days from compliance policy.
insufficient test data
Required markets that already have coverage signals.
insufficient test data
No market concentration yet.
Enough revenue movement makes the proof story believable instead of decorative.
insufficient test data%
Lead, booking and paid-order progression for the last 30 days.
insufficient test data
Revenue used as proof input for case studies and packaging.
0
Orders that can back up a proof pack without hand-waving.
insufficient test data
Gives the commercial story a more realistic price anchor.
Prioritized tenants that can move into publish, signoff or activation work next.
| Tenant | State | Next action |
|---|---|---|
| insufficient test data | ||
Reusable export paths for CRM, enablement and customer-facing proof review.
insufficient test data
review
Tenant rows sorted by strongest revenue signal first. This is the draft logo wall and reference queue.
| Tenant | Package | Usage | Revenue | Proof state | Next action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| insufficient test data | |||||
These are the companies that look most reference-ready from the current live signal set.
Where the proof ledger is actually captured from.
| Source | Artifacts |
|---|---|
| insufficient test data | |
This is the guardrail that stops us from publishing proof before legal notice, retention and market coverage are in place.
| Market | Artifacts | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| insufficient test data | ||
0
Can be translated into a draft reference with approval.
0
Good candidate, but not yet strong enough for a public story.
0
Needs activation or customer approval before it can be used externally.
insufficient test data
How much of the current tenant set is reference-ready today.