Current decision

90% ready, live volume proof pending

The operating model is strong. Final scale confidence needs a production-like soak, webhook storm with real connector credentials and SLO thresholds tuned against live traffic.

4

scale lanes

6

checks

4

proof tasks

Runtime proof lanes

What must keep working under pressure

Load and soak

Scale readiness surfaces separate dependency-aware load tests from real production-volume evidence.

  • load budget
  • soak window
  • p95 thresholds
  • tenant pressure

Queue and webhook pressure

Webhook storm, queue pressure and provider backoff states have owner, retry and recovery visibility.

  • webhook storm
  • queue backlog
  • retry drain
  • dead-letter visibility

Provider outage recovery

Provider degradation can be shown with customer-safe status, recovery ETA and next operational action.

  • degraded provider
  • fallback route
  • recovery ETA
  • incident owner

Incident and SLO communication

Reliability console, incident history and public status give an operator path from alert to postmortem.

  • SLO health
  • incident timeline
  • customer update
  • postmortem path

Acceptance

Scale confidence checks

  • Ops can explain system health without reading raw logs.
  • Queue pressure and webhook storm states show owner, retry path and ETA.
  • Provider outage behavior is customer-safe and does not leak internals.
  • Scale tests are archived with thresholds and result status.
  • Incident communication has owner, timeline and postmortem path.
  • Production-volume proof is not faked before real traffic exists.

Remaining proof

Needs live volume or real providers

  • Run production-like soak test with target tenant mix.
  • Archive webhook storm proof against real connector credentials.
  • Capture one provider outage simulation with customer-facing recovery message.
  • Validate SLO thresholds against live traffic after first customer cohort.